Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Josh Craddock's avatar

I like both: many non-English readers can benefit from a QR with alternative languages, food photos, even in fancy places. But this should be on demand, not via a plastic table tent sitting on every table. It can also house allergen information, dietary filters, or sections based on meal size. If calibrated correctly, it can also upsell (like Deliveroo or Careem).

In a café, for me, it can sit on the table as an alternative. I agree with your piece that physical menus should always be present in all venues, all the time. The experience you had abroad sounds awful. Luckily, I’ve not had the same problem, but I can see how it goes wrong - operator error, in my opinion.

Similarly, my pet peeve in a café or restaurant is when servers try to memorise the order instead of using a notepad and pen, then get it wrong. With QR ordering, it’s entirely on the customer, reducing the room for error. In low-engagement settings - cafés, QSRs, etc. - it makes sense for me, and I don’t really need to make conversation with the team or be upsold extra cream on my coffee. In restaurants, or any remotely premium setting, I’d expect the first option to be a printed menu. Always.

Sorry for the essay, a lot to unpack and we could go on 😁

Lisa Meli's avatar

Absolutely

I love the unopened beer analogy too!

We go out to dinner to engage with humanity not a bot - there are far too many digitised “solutions” that actually equate to less service and more work for the customer - not exactly what I would call a solution!

20 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?